[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: ordered memory access
    On 30 Sep 1999, Jes Sorensen wrote:

    >atomic_foo() should be ordered, at least that the idea behind it as

    It isn't. Also the atomic_inc/dec and set_bit clear_bit aren't.

    Only test_and_*_bit and atomic_dec_and_test enforce ordering between
    previous and following code.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.018 / U:13.520 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site