Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Sep 1999 19:58:18 -0400 | From | Wakko Warner <> | Subject | Re: Re: Is ide-scsi + scsi-cdrom a replacement for ide-cdrom? |
| |
> > On Wed, Sep 29 1999, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > > > I'm more interested in things that the IDE CD driver can do that > > > IDE-SCSI + SCSI-CDROM can't. I am tempted to create a kernel binary, > > > for possible distribution to N people on CD, that contains the IDE-SCSI > > > emulation layer and SCSI CD-ROM support _instead of_ IDE-CDROM support. > > > This makes IDE CD-R drivers work, among other things. > > In upcoming kernels, changer support will work equally well with ATAPI, > > SCSI and IDE-SCSI so that should not be an issue. ide-cd contains work > > arounds for faulty hardware that you will miss. I think the best solution > > would be a setup with both ide-scsi and ide-cd, running ordinary drives > > with ide-cd and cd-r/w with ide-scsi. > > How far is the IDE changer code? Can I put a couple (four) IDE CD changers > into my server so that it can act as CD jukebox, and this works? The disks > will be (more or less) all mounted, or probably I will configure autofs. It > would be nice if someone could patch autofs so that it mounts all CDs under > /autofs/$CDROM_LABEL, any idea about this?
I have seen with some ide chipsets and/or ide cdroms that ide-scsi doesn't work. The machine that did this is no longer in service for me, but it would lock the machine solid with 2.2.10 (it was a delta ide cdrom and via ide chipset) Sorry I can't give more info, the machine is gone.
I can say for sure that teac ide cdroms and piix4 chipsets work excelent!
-- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |