lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: possible spinlock optimizations
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote:

>no. [..]

The answer is _yes_. The fact that it's not interesting these days is
another issue and I agree with you.

If a spinlock got acquired two times by the same cpu then you'll sti() and
the NMI won't trigger the oops with Manfred's idea applyed.

Andrea


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.044 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site