lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Cosmetic bugs?
Hi Steve!

On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Steve Dodd wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 06:43:36PM +0100, ULISES ALONSO CAMARO wrote:
>
> > kmem_cache_create is called by there is no check in what they return, that
> > is, they do not panic() if they can't create cache entry, wich seems to me
> > wrong
>
> AFAICS,
^ ^ ^ ^

What does this mean?

> there's no way to recover in that situation, so not much point in
> checking the return code. Anything that tries to access the cache ptr will
> oops cleanly and give a backtrace. Hopefully it should be an "almost
> never happens" situation anyway.

yes, that's the reason I say "it's a cosmetic bug", but I think It should
be fixed, there is no good reason not to add that few lines of code

don't you think so?

Regards
Ulisses
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian/GNU Linux: a dream come true http://www.debian.org



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.158 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site