[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Why is chmod(2)?
    > binaries that call chmod(2) and they should continue to work.
    > But compatibility aside, can chmod(2) be implemented as chmod(3)
    > using open(2) and fchmod(2) and is the same true for all other
    > system calls which take pathnames as an argument?
    > b. Is it possible?

    Probably not - open has side effects. Open isnt allowed on devices not
    currently present.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.018 / U:0.060 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site