Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: kernel-hacking-HOWTO: An lk primer seeks feedback | From | Jes Sorensen <> | Date | 20 Sep 1999 20:53:11 +0200 |
| |
>>>>> "Andrea" == Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> writes:
Andrea> On 20 Sep 1999, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> enable_irq/disable_irq are quite expensive and should not be used
Andrea> disable_irq is expensive but disable_irq_nosync is quite fast Andrea> as it complete even if there are other irq running at the same Andrea> time.
It is relatively cheap on the PC, that doesn't mean it is cheap on all architectures.
>> are better off disabling interrupts directly on the device (most >> sane hardware has a bit to disable it) or using spin locks.
Andrea> If you need to grab the spinlock for a rasonable time then the Andrea> best is to disable_irq_nosync and then grab the spinlock as Andrea> 3c509 does, so you won't harm irq latency and you'll scale Andrea> equally well as a local cli on SMP.
3c509 is ISA which doesn't support shared interrupts. disable_irq stinks on shared interrupt devices.
As a rule of thumb it is much better to disable the interrupt at the real source, ie. the device, if possible.
Jes
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |