lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux 2.3.18ac5
    On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Alan Cox wrote:

    >
    > Ok give this a spin. We need to sort out the modules/setup argument thing yet.

    Note that a fix using MODULE_NAME() _will_ break the current semantics
    of some modules:
    - we (really) should enforce everyone to have a MODULE_NAME (can we get
    a default out of __FILE_NAME__ with some tricky macro??)
    - some already have a prefix encoded into their arguments (isapnp springs
    into my mind) - those will have to be ripped off - and it "breaks"
    backward-compatibility, as the prefixes are not always like "isapnp_"

    now, well if its easy, I'll look into it.

    Richard.


    --
    Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
    PGP: 2E829319 - 2F 83 FC 93 E9 E4 19 E2 93 7A 32 42 45 37 23 57
    WWW: http://www.anatom.uni-tuebingen.de/~richi/


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.018 / U:0.872 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site