[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: spin_lock and linux philosophy question...
Robert Dinse wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Momchil Velikov wrote:
> >
> > Spin locks are for cases when it is expected the lock to be held for
> > very short intervals, thus saving the sleep/wakeup overhead. For other
> > cases there are sleep locks (whatever they are called in each OS), where
> > indeed the CPU is sent to do something else.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -velco
> Thank you for the short explanation, and thank you David for the reference
> as I really do want to understand these things.

You can also use a spinlock in an interrupt handler, where you can't sleep at


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.044 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site