lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Shortening the Development Cycle... [maybe OffTopic, flame-bait?]
josepha48@yahoo.com (Joe) writes:

>say by this time such and such is done. Rather than useing a
>date, why not use a version number? Lets say 2.3.20 (pick one) .
>If you stuff is not in by that version number it does not get in
>this round. Then from 2.3.20 the kernel can be working on for
>fixes rather than new features. This means that hopefully by the
>time it reaches 2.3.25(?) it is stable enought to be released as

This idea gave us 0.99.14a - 0.99.14<x>

Regards
Henning

--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- hps@tanstaafl.de
TANSTAAFL! Consulting - Unix, Internet, Security

Hutweide 15 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 "There ain't no such
D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20 thing as a free Linux"

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.041 / U:2.124 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site