[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: /proc/cpuinfo verbiage differ unnecessarily between ports...
    >>>>> "David" == david parsons <o.r.c@p.e.l.l.p.o.r.t.l.a.n.d.o.r.u.s> writes:

    David> In article <>, Jes
    David> Sorensen <> wrote:
    >> Since none of the info in /proc/cpuinfo should be of interest to
    >> any tools

    David> Why not? I'd say that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo would
    David> be very interesting to tools, because it's what the operating
    David> system thinks it's running on.

    Why, it's a name of the CPU, MMU and FPU a bunch of version levels and
    a list of bugs. In principle these are of no interest to user space
    applications except for "my **** is bigger than your ****"

    Now while we are at it, please fix your mail client to stop eating the
    References: lines - it's very rude.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.018 / U:23.516 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site