[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: /proc/cpuinfo verbiage differ unnecessarily between ports...
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 10:44:57AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Steve Dodd <> writes:

> |> Would it not be more sensible to introduce a syscall or some such thing to
> |> do it?

> How about extending sysinfo(2)?

Without looking at it, what I think would be sensible is something that's
a read-only version of the sysctl stuff -- so we have a syscall, /and/ simply
formatted files in proc (probably just a single value per file). That way
the glibc people are happ(y|ier), and Mr. parsons can sit around attempting
to eliminate fork bombs by reading unchangeable values from files in /proc <g>

"His mind is like a steel trap -- full of mice"

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.036 / U:6.912 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site