Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Aug 1999 13:27:32 +0200 (CEST) | From | Osman <> | Subject | Re: Should this list be split between RELEASE and DEVELOPMENT?? |
| |
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Ben McCann wrote:
> In the wake of last week's spam attack, and the subsequent cleanup > performed by folks like David Miller, should we take time to reorganize > the mailing list? > > I would personally like two lists, one for released kernel (2.0, 2.2) issues > and another for developmemt kernels (2.3, etc). There is a _lot_ of traffic > on this list that I would love to automatically sort into separate mailboxes > based on the mailing list address. > > For example, 'linux-kernel-rel' and 'linux-kernel-dev'.
Well why not? But why split it that way? Why not "linux-kernel-v2.0" etc... Then you don't have to split them anymore in the future...
Just my 2 seconds of thoughts. TTYL. -- The dark ages were caused by the Y1K problem.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |