lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Should this list be split between RELEASE and DEVELOPMENT??
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Ben McCann wrote:

> In the wake of last week's spam attack, and the subsequent cleanup
> performed by folks like David Miller, should we take time to reorganize
> the mailing list?
>
> I would personally like two lists, one for released kernel (2.0, 2.2) issues
> and another for developmemt kernels (2.3, etc). There is a _lot_ of traffic
> on this list that I would love to automatically sort into separate mailboxes
> based on the mailing list address.
>
> For example, 'linux-kernel-rel' and 'linux-kernel-dev'.

Well why not?
But why split it that way?
Why not "linux-kernel-v2.0" etc...
Then you don't have to split them anymore in the future...

Just my 2 seconds of thoughts.
TTYL.
--
The dark ages were caused by the Y1K problem.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:2.237 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site