Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 14 Aug 1999 17:25:37 -0600 | From | yodaiken@chelm ... | Subject | Re: Prioritized I/O |
| |
I have a generic comment that adding priorities to a system that relies already on a different ordering mechanism is not easy.
RT devices are a much more sensible route.
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 07:33:44PM -0500, Steven Suson wrote: > I've been thinking about the discussions on latency, especially in > regards to multilmedia recording, etc. If I/O were prioritized in the > way that CPU utilization is, then this would allow R/T processes to also > take precendence for I/O, thus reducing latency. In addition, this > yields all sorts of benefits for time sensitive I/O. > > Any thoughts? Opinions? Etc.? > > Steven Suson > "Keep the faith." > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |