[lkml]   [1999]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: New resources - pls, explain :-(
Linus Torvalds <> wrote:

> readl() is for things that want to look like PCI (ie subsets of PCI like
> ISA and ISA PnP, or "look-alikes" of PCI like MCA).

OK, that's indeed useful to know, thanks.

In your opinion, should there be a guarantee that accesses initiated
by readl/writel/etc. will not be reordered?

Alternatively, should device driver writers be required to put in an
explicit statement (mb() or something similar) when they use
readl/writel/etc. and want to prevent the accesses being reordered?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.173 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site