lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.2.11: Complicated memory leak...
    On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 08:26:00AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
    > On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, CaT wrote:
    > > > no leak here...
    > >
    > > Somewhat butchered redhat 6.0 with glibc 2.1, gcc 2.95 and 2.2.11 kernel
    > > compiled with gcc 2.95 and -march=pentiumpro.
    > >
    > > been up for a day so far (not cos it crashed previously) and things
    > > are looking groovy.
    >
    > (anyone having the leak troubles)
    >
    > Have you seen the problem with free showing 4G of buffers or such? If
    > you see that, (and if it _does_ have the same consequences as in 2.3.x)
    > death isn't far away. I made a booboo in 2.3.x in using try_to_free_buffers
    > which caused the exact symptoms reported for 2.2.11. MM gets very upset
    > (murderously so) when buffermem doesn't get updated properly ;)
    >
    > The symptoms were remarkably similar, so I thought I'd mention it as
    > something to watch for.

    Nothing like that yet:

    total used free shared buffers cached
    Mem: 257948 184592 73356 19448 36664 122080
    -/+ buffers/cache: 25848 232100
    Swap: 128516 4916 123600

    But I'll keep an eyeball out for it...

    --
    CaT (cat@zip.com.au) URL: http://www.zip.com.au/dev/null


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.020 / U:29.472 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site