[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Patch for 2.2.10 (Quelle surprise!)
    >>>>> "Albert" == Albert D Cahalan <> writes:

    Albert> Jes Sorensen writes:
    >> You still haven't explained why a syscall/sysctl is needed for
    >> this when all the information can be obtained by parsing
    >> /proc/cpuinfo

    Albert> Obviously you haven't tried this in a cross-platform manner.
    Albert> (or you wrote the libc 6 sysconf() hack and think your code
    Albert> works)

    There is no point in it - the different architectures are just too
    different and people put totally different things in
    /proc/cpuinfo. Someone already suggested the m68k port for example
    should change their format to make parsing easier for him (I cannot
    remember who though) but there is absolutely no reason since we run
    different systems.

    Looking at the example put forward so far, it is quite obvious that
    the person suggesting it has not even looked at what other
    architectures put in /proc/cpuinfo.

    So to answer you questions Yes and No.


    Officially killfiled by Alex Buell on linux-kernel - now beat that!

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.019 / U:2.144 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site