Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 07 Jul 1999 11:02:45 +0800 (CST) | From | Frank Butter <> | Subject | Re: linux headers and C++ |
| |
On 06-Jul-99 Marc Mutz wrote: > you can't possibly mean to write greater parts of the kernel in C++?
No (thought I made that clear)! But there were made general statements that C++ isn't useful at all... and real OO would be something different than the it's approach. I just couldn't resist to state that I've different experiences with application-level projects.
> I believe low-level software should be written in a low-level language.
I agree. But then...I'm not quite sure where the exact line between low- and high- level soft should be drawn (no, I don't want to raise that microkernel issue again ;-).
frank
--- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cookie of the day: A billion here, a couple of billion there -- first thing you know it adds up to be real money. -- Senator Everett McKinley Dirksen
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Frank Butter <fbutter@ottomall.com.tw> sent on 07-Jul-99, at 10:54:06 OTTO-Chailease Mailorder Co., Ltd., Taipei
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |