[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Synchronous board drivers
Gergely Madarasz wrote:
: On Sun, 4 Jul 1999, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
: > Alan Cox wrote:
: > : > I agree with Krzysztof that sync board driver should be as simple
: > : > as possible, and syncppp.c (or whatever it will be named) should do
: > : > everything else (registering net device, switching link protocols, etc).
: > :
: > : Why ?
: > :
: > : What if I want to do things differently. Right now I can re-educate syncppp.
: > : I can for example switch to hardware ppp and use software for X.25
: > :
: > Yes, I know that mid-layer approach is not flexible enough,
: > but I think we still want to move more work (e.g. registering the device name
: > and maybe the character device emulation) to syncppp.c.
: Why is the character device emulation needed at all ?

I occasionaly use sync line for transfering raw data instead
of some network protocol. I think most sync board drivers have
some sort of character device emulation. IMHO it would be wise
to move it to syncppp.c.


\ Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at>
\\ PGP: finger kas at 0D99A7FB206605D7 8B35FCDE05B18A5E //
\\\ Czech Linux Homepage: ///
The new code base has not stabilized enough yet for benchmarking. Be patient,
we'll be sure to delay NT5's release a bit, trust me... (DaveM)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.071 / U:2.748 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site