Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 4 Jul 1999 11:48:32 +0200 (CEST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [patch] fix for OOM deadlock in swap_in (2.2.10) [Re: [test program] for OOM situations ] |
| |
On Sat, 3 Jul 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> +void oom(void) > { ... > + force_sig(SIGKILL, current);
> I would like to get some feedback about the patch. Thanks :).
I'm curious why you haven't yet included my process selection algoritm. I know it can select a blocked or otherwise unkillable process the way the code is in right now, but a workaround for that can be made in about 5 minutes.
The "show me the code" attitude doesn't seem to fit me now, unfortunately. I'm still busy moving house and I have to be a good python programmer by tomorrow. Having never seen much python but with the book in front of me :)
cheers,
Rik -- Open Source: you deserve to be in control of your data. +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Le Reseau netwerksystemen BV: http://www.reseau.nl/ | | Linux Memory Management site: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/ | | Nederlandse Linux documentatie: http://www.nl.linux.org/ | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |