lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: low priority soft RT?
On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 08:59:09PM +0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Unfortunately, that won't really do. We can, of course,
> just increase the range of nice levels, but all that does
> is increase the current "maximum deadlock time".

"maximum deadlock time" makes no sense. "delay" is the correct
word here.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.054 / U:1.772 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site