lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: low priority soft RT?
On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 06:00:11AM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> > I completely agree on this one. We should probably mark a process
> > with "bonus" if another process tries to grab a lock that's held
> > by the first process.
>
> "Priority inheritance."

Priority inversion?

Or is that something different?

--
UNIX - saving you from the Gates of hell

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.096 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site