Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Jul 1999 14:32:07 +0100 | From | Steve Dodd <> | Subject | Re: low priority soft RT? |
| |
On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 06:00:11AM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > I completely agree on this one. We should probably mark a process > > with "bonus" if another process tries to grab a lock that's held > > by the first process. > > "Priority inheritance."
Priority inversion?
Or is that something different?
-- UNIX - saving you from the Gates of hell
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |