[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: low priority soft RT?

    On Sat, 24 Jul 1999 14:15:39 +0200 (CEST), Rik van Riel
    <> said:

    > Promotion to a higher scheduling class shouldn't be too
    > difficult.

    Sure, but when, exactly, will you do this? The condition I saw in your
    latest SCHED_IDLE patches are insufficient for the long term. Testing
    the lock_depth is not good enough: there are large parts of the VFS
    which now run without the kernel spinlock, but which can still hold or
    block on other resources (eg. page locks).


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.018 / U:2.516 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site