[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: low priority soft RT?

On Sat, 24 Jul 1999 14:15:39 +0200 (CEST), Rik van Riel
<> said:

> Promotion to a higher scheduling class shouldn't be too
> difficult.

Sure, but when, exactly, will you do this? The condition I saw in your
latest SCHED_IDLE patches are insufficient for the long term. Testing
the lock_depth is not good enough: there are large parts of the VFS
which now run without the kernel spinlock, but which can still hold or
block on other resources (eg. page locks).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.067 / U:40.040 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site