lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] SCHED_IDLE (2.2.10 version)
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 cd_smith@ou.edu wrote:

> Well, it works fine here. I don't know enough about the kernel to
> dream up any really interesting tests, though. Any specific
> things to try that would be interesting?

Well, you could try running two lmbenches at the same time,
one at normal SCHED_OTHER latency and the other in SCHED_IDLE.

If that doesn't break the system, it probably means my patch
is pretty safe. If it _does_ break the system, could you tell
me which tests were running at that time -- then I know what
other situations to test for in the scheduler...

regards,

Rik -- Open Source: you deserve to be in control of your data.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Le Reseau netwerksystemen BV: http://www.reseau.nl/ |
| Linux Memory Management site: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/ |
| Nederlandse Linux documentatie: http://www.nl.linux.org/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans