[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: low priority soft RT?
    >>>>> "PM" == Pavel Machek <> writes:

    PM> That's the bad solution. Right solution is to promote threads that
    PM> are in kernel mode to non-SCHED_IDLE priority. It should be well
    PM> doable, and IMO is required for patch to be usable.

    As it is, the kernel locks often become a bottleneck on systems with
    lots of penguins. Look at this scenario:

    1) A process currently sleeping in kernel mode is ready to go forward

    2) At least one processor is busy running a SCHED_OTHER process

    Would it benefit throughput if it was guaranteed that the sleeping
    process gets to go forward at the expense of the already running
    process? It would mean that processes get out of kernel mode quicker.

    It would certainly be unfair, so there would have to be special
    protections in place to ensure that the process that benefits gets to
    pay later.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.019 / U:70.344 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site