Messages in this thread | | | From | "Stephen C. Tweedie" <> | Date | Sat, 24 Jul 1999 02:28:11 +0100 (BST) | Subject | Re: low priority soft RT? |
| |
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 18:00:01 +0100 (GMT), Matthew Kirkwood <weejock@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk> said:
> A patch which allows processes to deadlock the kernel will not, I hope, > be welcome.
Soft realtime tasks can already do so. It's nothing new in principle.
--Stephen
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |