[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Partition Sizing
    Hi Richard, Zack.

    >>>> In addition, you should symlink /tmp to /var/tmp and audit
    >>>> your rc scripts to make sure they don't need /tmp before
    >>>> /var is mounted. All modern distros I've tried get this
    >>>> right.

    >>> Why not just have /tmp a separate FS?

    >> I don't see any advantage of that over linking /tmp to /var/tmp.
    >> The only issue with not having /tmp on the root filesystem is if
    >> it's needed before the rest of the filesystems are mounted, and
    >> you'd have the same problem with a separate /tmp or a symlink.

    > OK, fair enough. I had originally read it as "/tmp -> /var/tmp
    > is better than mount /tmp". I guess you weren't saying that.

    > I personally prefer a separate /tmp so that dumb users don't
    > accidentally fill up /var (/var/spool, /var/log and so on).

    Personally, I prefer to have /tmp as a separate partition, with
    both /usr/tmp and /var/tmp as symlinks to it. That also has the
    advantage that /tmp is valid before the /tmp partition is mounted,
    so can be used right from boot-up, which it can't if one does that
    the other way round...

    Best wishes from Riley.

    | There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
    | development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
    | in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
    | else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.026 / U:1.420 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site