[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: low priority soft RT?
    On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Rogier Wolff wrote:

    > Chris, I worked on a Unix system a long time ago ('86), and there
    > they defined "nice 19" to be "when nobody else wants the CPU".
    > That was a VERY handy system. For example: rc5des would not
    > consume the 3-5% of the CPU of my system when I'm actually doing
    > something CPUbound.

    I used to (and will again if there's enough demand) maintain
    a SCHED_IDLE patch for the Linux kernel, but nowadays I use
    loadwatch(1) myself and it works good enough for me...

    Rik -- Open Source: you deserve to be in control of your data.
    | Le Reseau netwerksystemen BV: |
    | Linux Memory Management site: |
    | Nederlandse Linux documentatie: |

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.018 / U:55.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site