[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: FS corruption... some help maybe??
     >> When you leave these rare and necessary occasions away, what is
    >> left?

    >> Exact the situations, where NT falls over it's own bootstraps.

    > This is the problem. Win95/Win98/WinNT has to be rebooted a
    > dozen times just to install a new software package or piece of
    > hardware. And everyone gets used to the idea that changing
    > anything (dial-up networking, etc) means a "you must now reboot
    > windows for your changes to take effect."

    I remember seeing the following message somewhere, but can't think

    Q> Windows has detected that your mouse has moved. To implement
    Q> this change, it is necessary to reboot.

    Somebody PLEASE tell me that Windows isn't really THAT bad !!!

    > Unix/Linux isn't like that...
    > fortunately...

    Very true - uptime currently at 141 days on one of my systems, which
    is running kernel 2.2.2 quite happily...

    Best wishes from Riley.

    | There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
    | development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
    | in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
    | else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.020 / U:5.660 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site