[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: FS corruption... some help maybe??
 >> When you leave these rare and necessary occasions away, what is
>> left?

>> Exact the situations, where NT falls over it's own bootstraps.

> This is the problem. Win95/Win98/WinNT has to be rebooted a
> dozen times just to install a new software package or piece of
> hardware. And everyone gets used to the idea that changing
> anything (dial-up networking, etc) means a "you must now reboot
> windows for your changes to take effect."

I remember seeing the following message somewhere, but can't think

Q> Windows has detected that your mouse has moved. To implement
Q> this change, it is necessary to reboot.

Somebody PLEASE tell me that Windows isn't really THAT bad !!!

> Unix/Linux isn't like that...
> fortunately...

Very true - uptime currently at 141 days on one of my systems, which
is running kernel 2.2.2 quite happily...

Best wishes from Riley.

| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.046 / U:1.420 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site