[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [security]: kernel ioctl()'s [3]
Alexander Viro <> wrote:
> As for the big change... Nope. I'm testing the patch right now.
> It's small. I took 4 bits (0x10000-0x2000) and that should be changed in
> the final version, indeed. But that means changing 4 macros. I *had*
> a reason to move IMMUTABLE/APPEND_ONLY handling to VFS ;-) And that was
> done several months ago. The rest is not large.

Thinking about the importance of avoiding a reboot during system
upgrades: I presume that, unless the containing directory is immutable
or append_only, that such files can be renamed?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.051 / U:11.720 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site