lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: AMIGA will use Linux, but Linux has several "multimedia-deficiencies"
In <99071018080700.00820@linuxhost.localdomain> Benno Senoner (sbenno@gardena.net) wrote:
> Hello,

> I've just read that the next generation AMIGA will use Linux as the core OS,
> instead of QNX. ( http://www.amiga.com/diary/executive/linux-e.html )

> Amiga is a multimedia platform, and therefore needs realtime capatibilites.

> Unfortunately actually Linux doesn't allow to play any realtime
> (low-latency) mulimedia content (audio/video,etc.) in a reliable fashion
> , during high system load, especially disk I/O.
> I was very disappointed when I benchmarked a 130ms max scheduling latency of a
> realtime scheduled audio process (playing from RAM) under high disk I/O load on
> my PII400 + 16GB UDMA harddisk. (for infos see my latency benchmark page)
> Even Win98 is able to get 17ms audio latency on my machine (during
> heavy disk I/O) without many problems.


> It's a bit disappointing that under Linux we get latencies which are
> 50-100times the realistic (<5ms) latencies, we are FAR AWAY from the hardware
> limits.

> I was shocked when disabling DMA on my HD, my realtime process was
> not rescheduled for *4000ms* = 4sec !
> (a 100m sprinter is able to run 35m in the same time :-) )

> Not only the audio layer is affected but many other subsystems too.
> For example benchmarking usleep() I noticed a max 100-150ms scheduling
> latency during high disk I/O load.
> I don't understand why a process should block occasionally up to 150ms , when
> usleep()ing only a few ms, because of the high disk I/O.

> Actually there seems not a big interest to cure these deficiencies, just
> because many see Linux as a server OS , and not a desktop OS,
> on a web-server or fileserver you don't need guaranteed timing.
> (Or is there already some unoffical work underway to cure the scheduling
> problems of Linux ?)

> Who cares if his webpage shows up 150ms earlier or later ? ,
> or if your netscape executable which comes from the NFS server, is loaded
> 150ms later ? No one, I think.

> Does anyone know if the disk device driver (or device drivers in general) can be
> preempted from regular processes or is there no way to do this on Linux.
> Do we really need a microkernel to handle realtime multimedia ?

> Hopefully Amiga Inc, will help us to optimize these Linux deficiencies, through
> collaborating with the kernel/audio/video developement folks.

> comments ?

Are you tested all this stuff with `hdparm -u 1' or not ? If not then it
can be expected. Plus you can always use RTLinux if you wish ...




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans