[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [security]: kernel ioctl()'s [3]

On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Chris Evans wrote:

> IMHO, immutable support is fine as it is - as Alan has rightly said,
> giving users the opportunity to set some variant of immutable on their
> files, is dangerous.

Why? user-immutable can be removed by user and by root. If the
system-immutable is set the user-immutable simply doesn't affect anything
(except that if you will remove system-immutable user-immutable will be
still there; you can remove it as you can remove sticky, group-writable,
whatever). What is dangerous with that?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.085 / U:0.456 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site