Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Jun 1999 11:49:53 +0100 (GMT) | From | Matthew Kirkwood <> | Subject | Re: Preparations for ZD's upcoming Apache/Linux benchmark |
| |
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > Besides, it's (a) optional and (b) localized (doesn't mess around with > > > any other kernel code). You wouldn't want it in a machine that wasn't > > > a web server as its main function, that's for sure. > > > > Or was a real world web server. > > You could use it in conjunction with something like Apache to handle the > static items -- images etc. Probably would work quite well. > > > But how does khttpd compare to Zab's phhttpd work, which is user space ?
Could someone point me to this?
> Well, for one thing, khttpd is purely hypothetical at this point :)
Not at all. See http://www.fenrus.demon.nl/
Matthew.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |