Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Jun 1999 14:29:12 +1000 | From | CaT <> | Subject | Re: Devfs, was Re: Migrating to larger numbers |
| |
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 02:22:16PM +1000, Richard Gooch wrote: > Jamie Lokier writes: > > Richard Gooch wrote: > > > if all your CD-ROMs devices are unloaded and you have module > > > autoloading, then to find all CD-ROMs on the system, you just do: > > > opendir ("/dev/ide/cd"); > > > loop; > > > opendir ("/dev/sr"); > > > loop; > > > > > > and your directory scanning code knows that each and every entry > > > (besides "." and "..":-) is a Genuine CD-ROM[tm] that actually exists > > > on your system. > > > > Ugh, it will miss the _other_ CD-ROMs in your system. > > > > /dev/parport/cd > > /dev/pcmcia/cd > > /dev/usb/cd > > > > Doesn't look like the right way to me. > > It is the right way. The concept is still valid. Just extend my > example code. It wasn't meant to be complete, just enough to convey > the idea. Did I really have to spell that out? > > Also, I expect that a PCMCIA CD-ROM will really be an IDE CD-ROM. A > parport CD-ROM will probably be either IDE or SCSI.
Out of curiosity, why not also have the reverse? since it's a virtual device it can be done automatically and then if you want a cd you can open /dev/cd/ (or something similar) and go through anything in there. That way you don't have to guess at the possible ways of connecting a cd to the machine when you want to find them all.
-- CaT (cat@zip.com.au) URL: http://zipper.zip.com.au/dev/null
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |