lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Migrating to larger numbers
Richard Gooch <rgooch@atnf.csiro.au> wrote:
> However, for the sake of argument, let's say we write device drivers
> and make use of dynamic device numbers. I don't actually see where the
> problem is.

Ok, consider this scenario:

(1) Some application is using device files over NFS. [If this isn't
happening, there's no problem with 64 bit device numbers.] Let's use
your "exporting root to legacy machines" case...

(2) The system uses SCSI. [This is an example where 64 bit device
numbers might be good.]

(3) The NFS server gets taken down for a few minutes and disks get added
to it. [This is the case where the semantics of the device numbers
become significant.]

NFS semantics suggest that the application freeze while the server
is unavailable, and everything continue on after it comes back up.

--
Raul

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.104 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site