lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Mounting rw is slower than ro?
Date
Followup to:  <375A8442.364BEF88@student.anu.edu.au>
By author: Martijn van Oosterhout <s3100411@student.anu.edu.au>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> I've been wondering about this for a while now.
>
> Why is it that mounting a 5Gig partition read-only
> is instanteous, but mounting read-write take
> forever (well, a while anyway)
>
> Please CC any replies... The HTTP Archive is a
> bit unreliable :)
>

Simple: you have to be a lot more conservative when you're about to
*modify* something, as opposed to just *examine* it. The latter can't
do any harm to your data, even if the filesystem is corrupted
beforehand. The former, however, could make some corruption a lot
worse.

-hpa
--
"The user's computer downloads the ActiveX code and simulates a 'Blue
Screen' crash, a generally benign event most users are familiar with
and that would not necessarily arouse suspicions."
-- Security exploit description on http://www.zks.net/p3/how.asp

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog