Messages in this thread |  | | From | (H. Peter Anvin) | | Subject | Re: Mounting rw is slower than ro? | | Date | 6 Jun 1999 22:04:33 GMT |
| |
Followup to: <375A8442.364BEF88@student.anu.edu.au> By author: Martijn van Oosterhout <s3100411@student.anu.edu.au> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > I've been wondering about this for a while now. > > Why is it that mounting a 5Gig partition read-only > is instanteous, but mounting read-write take > forever (well, a while anyway) > > Please CC any replies... The HTTP Archive is a > bit unreliable :) >
Simple: you have to be a lot more conservative when you're about to *modify* something, as opposed to just *examine* it. The latter can't do any harm to your data, even if the filesystem is corrupted beforehand. The former, however, could make some corruption a lot worse.
-hpa -- "The user's computer downloads the ActiveX code and simulates a 'Blue Screen' crash, a generally benign event most users are familiar with and that would not necessarily arouse suspicions." -- Security exploit description on http://www.zks.net/p3/how.asp
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |