Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Jun 1999 08:00:55 -0700 | From | (Jim Gettys) | Subject | Re: Linux and Apache performance, Update |
| |
> From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> > Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 15:49:31 +0100 (BST) > To: jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys) > Cc: jdeong@cnmnetwork.com, ak-uu@muc.de, dank@alumni.caltech.edu, > linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, ju@ct.heise.de > Subject: Re: Linux and Apache performance, Update > ----- > > So the common, valid, comparison most real people will want to see is > ^^^^^
The comparison is valid (Apache vs. IIS): the benchmarks, unfortunately, generally are not valid...
I think we're in violent agreement here, Alan.
> > IMNSHO there are no valid comparison benches available. That is a problem and > not just for Apache.
Yup....
I'm very aware of this, being editor of the HTTP/1.1 spec. W3C's WCA is trying to get data that might make it possible to generate more reasonable benchmarks. - Jim
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |