[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: zero-copy TCP fileserving
> Something like:
> (1) A checksum of zero means don't check the checksum.
> (2) You can't route a zero-checksum IP packet. If you route it,
> you must checksum it before routing.

LAN CRC's aren't sufficient. They protect card->card not host->host. And
the world _does_ see host->host errors. Also IP checksums are cheap, even
in silicon

> This would allow LANs to operate at higher speeds where a hardware CRC
> makes sure the data is good anyway, while maintaining compatibility

It would make no difference. The cost nowdays is the cost per packet big time.
Going to bigger packets is a huge win. The checksum helps but not that much.

There are also people researching using FPGA's to do hardware assisted
IP handling (eg hardware TCP demux)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.213 / U:10.204 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site