lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Rudolf Leitgeb wrote:

>If the fs is single threaded, I assume that it's protected by some form
>of lock, and every process that waits for I/O will sleep, i.e. not accumulate

We was talking about the big kernel lock.

>more time in the CPU. Even if the fs code was protected by a spin lock, this
>would only show up in the system time, not in the user time ...

yes (at least theorically).

Andrea


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.064 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site