Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Jun 1999 04:43:01 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database |
| |
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> For now, every app with this problem has to implement something like > a growable (and hopefully shrinkable) filesystem within a file. > Apps can add a block mapping layer complete with triple-indirect > blocks, or they can copy around huge amounts of data and update > document references as needed.
The point being that they *do* that. Each has its own bloody format. Each will *have* to carry that code around, unless you will manage to push every blasted thing into the kernels. Yup, plural. Linux is not the only UNIX. Good luck doing that. If you are going to invent a new uniform scheme - fine, go ahead, implement it as filesystem and I will write a loopback-mount-on-the-fly. Oh, and don't forget to make them switch to new format. Deal?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |