lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: iToaster in violation of GPL?
In <E10xfHx-0005Ii-00@calista.inka.de> Bernd Eckenfels (ecki@lina.inka.de) wrote:
> In article <ABMiPStKvP@khim.sch57.msk.ru> you wrote:
>> This is for the beginning, of course. It's REALLY important check of GPL and
>> we must be ready to go as far as in court :-/ But first thing to do is to
>> ask them gently about Linux, GPL, iToaster and OS sources... And this is duty
>> of Linus I afraid (even he hate such stuff as we all know). Even if Microworks
>> violated copyright of few tens different persons at least with Linux usage...

> Well.. of course there is a lot of non-GPL Code in the kernel...

Sure ? Where ?

P.S. Non-GPL license is Ok, just non-GPL compatible is non-acceptable. Any
license with ability to give binary without sources are not GPL-compatible.




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.059 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site