lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Why Linux is doomed
    Date
    In article <linux.kernel.199906240100.VAA09552@renoir.op.net>,
    Paul Barton-Davis <pbd@Op.Net> wrote:
    >>From: leitner@convergence.de
    >
    >>It is people like me who do the quality assurance for Linux.
    >>People like me who complain. And if there is just _one_ goof like the
    >>FAT problem, there are literally thousands of people who will run into
    >>this problem and be discouraged to upgrade their kernel in the future.
    >
    >You just don't get it do you ?
    >
    >We don't *want* "people" upgrading their kernels to any development
    >version.

    You may not.

    But you're not Linus, so it may be a bit presumptious to speak
    for him.


    ____
    david parsons \bi/ if nobody tests the kernels, would
    \/ that make them better?

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.020 / U:0.636 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site