lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Why khttpd is a bad idea
Date
> I follow up this discussion a while and don't know why there are so many
> concerns:
>
> 1st: it is a _module_ i.e. It does not bloat the kernel!
> 2nd: it would help embedded stuff very much
> 3rd: when you don't need it, don't load the module

Okay, fine with me. My only concern is that Alan Cox's excellent ideas for
a more general capability might get lost. But I don't want to stop anyone
from writing khttpd -- and I couldn't if I did want to. I'm just giving an
opinion on how useful it will be, in hopes that my thoughts may be useful.

Chris Smith



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.041 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site