Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Sun, 20 Jun 1999 16:57:46 +0200 |
| |
In article <XFMail.990620143910.infrared@a-b.hu> you wrote:
> My opinion is that starting to put everything in the kernel is a very-very bad > idea. This thing startted with knfsd, now comes khttpd, kftpd, kraserver... [snip] > I think, the best solution for this problem would be to implement a clear > interface which would allow loadable modules to provide such services.
You obviously haven't seen kHTTPd. It _IS_ a module, so at least your concerns are met.
Greetings, Arjan van de Ven
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |