lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about
From
Date
In article <XFMail.990620143910.infrared@a-b.hu> you wrote:

> My opinion is that starting to put everything in the kernel is a very-very bad
> idea. This thing startted with knfsd, now comes khttpd, kftpd, kraserver...
[snip]
> I think, the best solution for this problem would be to implement a clear
> interface which would allow loadable modules to provide such services.

You obviously haven't seen kHTTPd. It _IS_ a module, so at least your
concerns are met.

Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:2.141 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site