Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 20 Jun 1999 14:37:03 -0700 (PDT) | From | Dan Hollis <> | Subject | Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about |
| |
On Sun, 20 Jun 1999, Zach Brown wrote: > > Exactly. In-kernel http is lower memory profile, simpler, and faster. > having to change your httpd along with kernel internals is simpler? :)
This is exactly what you have to do with phhttpd right now, isnt it?
> the current khttpd with its thread/connection certainly isn't low memory > profile either, but I'll grant Arjan that its just a matter of coding to > fix that.
If youre going to criticize khttpd, attack the khttpd concept not the current test code.
-Dan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |