lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: UUIDs (and devfs and major/minor numbers)
    From
       From: o.r.c@p.e.l.l.p.o.r.t.l.a.n.d.o.r.u.s (david parsons)
    Date: 17 Jun 1999 17:41:19 -0700

    The namespace for /dev was dictated a long time ago, and you vary
    from that namespace at your own risk.

    I think herein lies some of the confusion about devfs vs. procfs, et.al.

    The files in /dev fall into two categories. Some were indeed dictated a
    long time ago, and indeed you can't change them without causing all
    osrts of problems with programs and shell scripts which have these names
    hard-coded into them. Examples of such names include /dev/tty,
    /dev/null, and so on. I would argue that procfs falls in the same
    category, since most (but certainly not all) of the usage of the proc
    filesystem, especially the non-process related aspects of the proc
    filesystem, are used by programs. (For example: free, ps, etc.)

    There is however second class of files which live in /dev, and for those
    files the names are really up to the system administrator, and are a
    matter between the whims of the system adminsitator and the various
    configuration files which list those devices: /etc/inittab, /etc/fstab,
    etc. Examples of such device names include names for disk drives,
    tapes, cd-roms, and ttys, and so on. Indeed, this is why devfs can
    use device names such as /dev/dsk/... instead of /dev/hda1 without
    causing all hell to break loose.

    While there are some naming conventions which most people subscribe to
    for these second class of device files/names in /dev, they are by no
    means fixed. And it's for these classes of device names, where I
    believe hardcoding a new naming convention into the kernel is especially
    a bad idea.

    And so again, *yes*, devfs is different from procfs. One can be in
    favour of the latter without being in favour of the former, and this is
    why.

    - Ted

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.025 / U:91.516 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site