[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Bug in mkdir(2)

On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, Alexander Viro wrote:
> >
> > In other words, if foo is a dangling symlink mkdir("foo/") will merrily
> > follow it. Which it shouldn't.
> Why? I think the follows symlink behaviour is the right one, and is
> consistent with "open" etc. Are there any pressing reasons to not do it?

Oh, well... Looks like it's a really borderline case - everybody seem to
be doing whatever they want here. In situations when the last component is
a link and call normally wouldn't follow it adding slashes seems to be
ignored on Solaris and forces the link expansion on Linux and 4.4BSD...
I still think that following the link is bogus, but after all, if somebody
wants to hang let's give him the rope...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.076 / U:0.548 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site