[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Bug in mkdir(2)

    On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, Alexander Viro wrote:
    > >
    > > In other words, if foo is a dangling symlink mkdir("foo/") will merrily
    > > follow it. Which it shouldn't.
    > Why? I think the follows symlink behaviour is the right one, and is
    > consistent with "open" etc. Are there any pressing reasons to not do it?

    Oh, well... Looks like it's a really borderline case - everybody seem to
    be doing whatever they want here. In situations when the last component is
    a link and call normally wouldn't follow it adding slashes seems to be
    ignored on Solaris and forces the link expansion on Linux and 4.4BSD...
    I still think that following the link is bogus, but after all, if somebody
    wants to hang let's give him the rope...

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.020 / U:78.712 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site