Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 12 Jun 1999 22:25:06 +0200 (CEST) | From | Davide Libenzi <> | Subject | Re: New schedule() and semaphore implementation ... |
| |
Andrea wrote:
>It does _not_ the same thing. You don't know at wakeup time which will be >the CPU that will get the task. You don't know which will be its prev->mm.
OK, I've missed SMP issues. But sure that if my goodness loop in __sem_wake_up() don't release the best task neither LIFO & FIFO will do. Anyway is better a FIFO politics then give all tasks the free way.
Cheers, Davide
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |