lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: New schedule() and semaphore implementation ...

Andrea wrote:

>It does _not_ the same thing. You don't know at wakeup time which will be
>the CPU that will get the task. You don't know which will be its prev->mm.

OK, I've missed SMP issues.
But sure that if my goodness loop in __sem_wake_up() don't release the best
task neither LIFO & FIFO will do.
Anyway is better a FIFO politics then give all tasks the free way.

Cheers,
Davide




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.052 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site