[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: generalizing khttpd
    In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.9906111541300.1617-100000@hoser> you wrote:

    > who needs multiple processes? My sily siginfo server has done 3500
    > requests a second with a single thread over localhost in 2.3.x.
    > yes, it cheats ;)

    What client are you using to generate THAT kind of load. When I benchmark
    kHTTPd on localhost (using ApacheBench), ApacheBench takes virtually all of
    the CPU.

    > also notice that the newer apache using this stuff will also be usable
    > under solaris/*bsd, etc, etc. does khttpd even work under 2.3 yet?

    I haven't installed 2.3 yet... But the module is rather clean, i.e. it only
    uses "normal" module calls.

    > god forbid, a non linux unix?


    Arjan van de Ven

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.018 / U:11.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site