[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: generalizing khttpd
In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.9906111541300.1617-100000@hoser> you wrote:

> who needs multiple processes? My sily siginfo server has done 3500
> requests a second with a single thread over localhost in 2.3.x.
> yes, it cheats ;)

What client are you using to generate THAT kind of load. When I benchmark
kHTTPd on localhost (using ApacheBench), ApacheBench takes virtually all of
the CPU.

> also notice that the newer apache using this stuff will also be usable
> under solaris/*bsd, etc, etc. does khttpd even work under 2.3 yet?

I haven't installed 2.3 yet... But the module is rather clean, i.e. it only
uses "normal" module calls.

> god forbid, a non linux unix?


Arjan van de Ven

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.037 / U:0.864 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site