lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: New schedule() and semaphore implementation ...
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Davide Libenzi wrote:

>I don't know if this is correct because of the new version of "up".

You _can't_ use it with your wake_up_sem(). I just thought about that. But
I think it would be better to do a real FIFO instead of your goodness
approch. We should have a way to choose which kind of wakeup to do on
waitqueues. And now that waitqueues are double linked list choosing
between FIFO and LIFO should be trivial.

Andrea Arcangeli


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.049 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site