[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Dan Koren <> writes:

> File system companies like Transarc or Veritas could not exist if
> such were the case. File systems can be ported between different
> OS's, even though this isn't trivial. Developing a transactional
> file system from scratch is still a lot more work than porting an
> existing one.

Transarc may not be a good example here; many of the tricky bits of
AFS stay in userland, where it's much easier to port things.

It is still possible to port an entirely in-kernel filesystem without
_too_ much pain, though -- I'm doing it now for a filesystem based on
our NASD research that was originally written for OSF1. Apart from
some cache issues, the port process has been surprisingly painless.


nat lanza --------------------- research programmer, parallel data lab, cmu scs --------------------------------
there are no whole truths; all truths are half-truths -- alfred north whitehead

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.084 / U:3.584 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site